Logo
Audiobook Image

How to Improve Your GRE Reading Comprehension Score

July 17th, 2024

00:00

Play

00:00

Star 1Star 2Star 3Star 4Star 5

Summary

  • Exploration of techniques to enhance GRE reading comprehension
  • Overview of GRE verbal reasoning and question types
  • Strategies for identifying main ideas and author's tone
  • Using elimination to efficiently tackle comprehension questions
  • Practical walkthrough of sample GRE passage analysis

Sources

In an industrial suburb on the outskirts of Reykjavik, Icewind has established its operations in a former coal power plant. Here, they meticulously handcraft wind turbines under the leadership of Thor, the company’s business chief, and Ce Thor, a former nuclear engineer. The model they produce is known as the News Rotor Collectors Wind Turbine, more commonly referred to as a Savonius vertical axis wind turbine. This design, although ancient in origin, tracing back to the Persian Empire, has been revamped using modern materials like carbon fiber and stainless steel to enhance durability and performance. These modifications ensure the turbines can withstand harsh weather without overspinning, maintaining simplicity in design to keep costs low. The unique design of Icewind’s turbines not only makes them highly functional in both low and excessively high winds but also aesthetically pleasing; many mistake them for sculptures rather than energy-producing devices. Recognizing this, the company has focused on enhancing the visual appeal of the turbines. Currently, Icewind is conducting trials across Iceland and plans to start selling its turbines globally later this year. Thor is eager to showcase Icelandic ingenuity on a larger scale, viewing this venture as part of Iceland’s long history of resilience and innovation in the face of isolation. Transitioning from the innovative prowess of Icewinds wind turbines, lets pivot to an examination of intellectual agility as it relates to standardized testing. The Graduate Record Examination, or GRE, is a pivotal stepping stone for many aspiring graduate students. It serves as a measure of a candidates readiness for the rigors of graduate-level education. Among its various components, the Verbal Reasoning section is particularly critical in assessing a test-takers command of the English language, both in terms of vocabulary and reading comprehension. The Verbal Reasoning section of the GRE is designed to evaluate the ability to analyze and draw conclusions from discourse, reason from incomplete data, understand multiple levels of meaning, such as literal, figurative, and author’s intent, and to summarize text and distinguish major from minor points. The verbal section is also a test of vocabulary, particularly the ability to understand the meanings of words, sentences, and entire texts, and to understand relationships among words and among concepts. Within this section, test-takers are presented with a variety of question types, each aimed at gauging different aspects of verbal reasoning ability. One will encounter reading comprehension questions, which form the core of the verbal section. These questions are based on passages that cover a wide range of topics, from the humanities and natural sciences to the social sciences and business. Test-takers must navigate these texts, discerning the main ideas, identifying the authors perspective, and making inferences based on the given information. Apart from reading comprehension, the section includes text completion questions that challenge one to use contextual clues to fill in blanks within a short passage. Sentence equivalence questions, on the other hand, require the selection of two choices that lead to a complete, coherent sentence while producing sentences that are similar in meaning. The questions come in multiple forms: some are multiple-choice with a single answer, while others may ask for one or more selections from a list of options, requiring a more nuanced understanding of the passage. Additionally, some questions demand that the examinee select specific sentences from the text that fulfill a particular function or embody the response to the stated query. A strategic approach to these questions is indispensable. For multiple-choice questions with a single answer, the task is straightforward – select the one option that most accurately aligns with the information or intent presented in the passage. However, when multiple answers are correct, the test-taker must identify all applicable choices to receive credit for the question; partial answers are not scored. This underscores the necessity of a thorough and meticulous analysis of the text. Moreover, questions that require selecting sentences from the passage call for a keen understanding of the authors argument and supporting details. These items test the ability to discern the structural and argumentative elements of the passage, such as thesis statements, evidence, counterarguments, and conclusions. In essence, the Verbal Reasoning section of the GRE is an arena where ones command of the English language is put to the test. It is a multifaceted evaluation of ones ability to not just understand and appreciate sophisticated prose but also to critically engage with it in a nuanced and precise manner. Mastery over this section can significantly bolster ones overall GRE score, opening doors to advanced educational opportunities. With a clear understanding of the diverse question types that populate the GRE Verbal Reasoning section, attention must now be turned to the pivotal role of reading comprehension within this evaluative framework. Reading comprehension is not merely about parsing through lines of text; it is an intricate dance of interpretation, critical thinking, and analytical acuity. It is here that many test-takers encounter formidable challenges, from deciphering dense academic prose to discerning subtle nuances in tone and argument structure. The ability to adeptly navigate these reading comprehension passages is crucial, as they form the backbone of the verbal section. Test-takers must employ a variety of strategies to dissect and comprehend these passages effectively. The first step is identifying the main idea. This is the overarching concept or argument that the author seeks to convey. Often encapsulated within the thesis statement, the main idea serves as the anchor around which the passage is structured. In addition to grasping the main idea, one must also attune to the authors tone. Is it skeptical, enthusiastic, objective, or something else entirely? The tone can offer invaluable insight into the authors perspective and can guide the interpretation of the text. Similarly, understanding the structure of the passage—whether it is comparative, cause-and-effect, or narrative—can illuminate the authors method of building the argument or conveying information. To hone ones analysis of the passage, it is imperative to recognize the task of each question. Questions may ask test-takers to draw inferences, identify author assumptions, or interpret meaning. Each question type requires a tailored approach; for instance, inference questions demand that one read between the lines, whereas questions about the authors assumptions necessitate a critical evaluation of the texts underlying premises. Finding relevant information within the passage is another critical skill. This involves sifting through the text to locate the specific details or statements that pertain directly to the question at hand. It is a skill that requires both precision and efficiency, especially under the time constraints of the exam. Here are some tips that can guide test-takers through this process: 1. Skim the passage first to get a general sense of the content and structure. 2. Read the first and last sentences of each paragraph carefully, as they often contain the main ideas. 3. Pay close attention to transition words and phrases, as they can signal shifts in argument or important points. 4. Make note of any examples or evidence the author uses to support the main idea. 5. Be wary of answer choices that introduce information not present in the passage or that distort its meaning. In applying these strategies, test-takers can elevate their reading comprehension capabilities, transforming a potential obstacle into a testament to their linguistic and analytical prowess. As with the mastery of any skill, practice is paramount. Regular engagement with reading materials from diverse disciplines and practicing with past GRE questions can sharpen ones ability to dissect passages and respond to related questions with confidence and acumen. The ultimate goal is to approach the reading comprehension component not merely as a hurdle to be surmounted but as an opportunity to demonstrate ones full intellectual capacity. The strategies outlined thus far serve as a foundation for engaging with reading comprehension passages on the GRE. However, even with a well-honed approach to understanding text, test-takers may still face the challenge of choosing the correct response from a set of seemingly plausible options. This is where the process of elimination becomes an invaluable technique, enabling more efficient navigation through the thicket of potential answers. The process of elimination is straightforward in concept yet nuanced in application. It involves systematically discarding answer choices that are least likely to be correct, thereby increasing the odds of selecting the right answer. To wield this technique effectively, one must be adept at recognizing common distractors that frequently appear among answer choices. Recycled language is a primary distractor that test-takers must be cautious of. These are answer choices that use words or phrases lifted directly from the passage. While such options may seem correct due to their familiarity, they often do not accurately address the questions specific focus. Instead, they serve to lure the unwary into selecting an answer that is correct in detail but wrong in context. Extreme language is another red flag. Answer choices that employ absolutes, such as always, never, the only, or the best, can often be eliminated. The GRE tends to favor nuanced and qualified language that acknowledges complexity and avoids overgeneralization. Thus, options that present an exaggerated or overly definitive stance are typically incorrect. Out-of-scope information presents yet another pitfall. These are answers that introduce concepts or details not discussed in the passage. They may sound convincing, particularly if they include factual statements or common knowledge, but if the passage does not provide a basis for the information, such choices must be dismissed. Avoiding assumptions is critical when applying the process of elimination. Test-takers must resist the urge to infuse the passage with their own interpretations or external knowledge. The correct answer must be supported by the text itself, and any choice that requires additional assumptions is suspect. To further illustrate, consider the following scenario: A question asks for the primary purpose of a passage discussing the economic impact of renewable energy. An answer choice that focuses on the environmental benefits of renewable energy might use familiar terms from the passage but fails to address the economic angle, making it a recycled language distractor. Another choice that asserts renewable energy is the single most important factor in economic growth employs extreme language and can likely be eliminated. A third option that discusses government policy changes, if not mentioned in the passage, would be considered out-of-scope information. By mastering the process of elimination, test-takers can swiftly pare down their options, honing in on the most credible responses. It is a powerful method that, when combined with a thorough understanding of the passage and the questions asked, can significantly enhance the likelihood of success on the GREs reading comprehension questions. This technique, judiciously applied, allows one to cut through the noise of distractors, leaving the clarity of the right answer in sharper relief. Building upon the strategies and techniques already discussed, its imperative to see these methods in action. A practical application through a sample GRE reading comprehension passage allows for a demonstration of how to dissect the passage, identify its key components, and answer questions with precision. Imagine a passage discussing the historical significance of the Silk Road. To analyze effectively, one must first identify key sentences that signal the authors claim or the main ideas. Typically, these sentences are located at the beginning or end of paragraphs and are often marked by assertive language or topic sentences that encapsulate the paragraphs content. For instance, a sentence that states, The Silk Road not only facilitated the exchange of goods but also served as a conduit for cultural and intellectual exchange, could be identified as a key sentence. It suggests that the authors claim extends beyond the economic impact of the Silk Road to include its broader cultural significance. Once the main ideas are established, the next step is to tackle the questions. A question about the main idea, such as What is the primary focus of the passage regarding the Silk Road? would require one to consider the authors overarching claim. The correct answer should encapsulate both the economic and cultural roles of the Silk Road, reflecting the synthesis presented in the key sentence. When faced with a vocabulary in context question, one must consider the word within the passages framework. If the passage uses a word like conduit and the question asks for its meaning in context, the test-taker must discern that conduit here refers to a means of transmission, particularly for cultural and intellectual ideas, rather than its literal meaning of a pipe or channel. Inference questions ask test-takers to read between the lines. For example, if asked, What can be inferred about the cities along the Silk Road? a test-taker would need to use details from the passage about the cultural and intellectual exchanges to conclude that these cities were likely centers of multicultural interaction, even if the passage doesnt state this outright. To demonstrate a step-by-step approach: First, read the passage to grasp the general content and structure. Next, identify and annotate key sentences and the authors claim. Then, approach each question by first predicting an answer before looking at the options. This prediction should be based solely on the passages content. Finally, use the process of elimination to remove distractors and select the answer that closely aligns with the prediction and is supported by the passage. Through this methodical approach to answering GRE reading comprehension questions, test-takers can elevate their performance. By internalizing these strategies and practicing regularly with a variety of passages, one can develop a keen eye for detail and a sharp mind for analysis, both of which are essential for success on the GRE and beyond.